Discussion:
pear module naming
Charles Fry
2006-05-30 15:38:22 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Currently PHP Pear modules are named php-<name>. Since these modules are
actually libraries would it not be more appropriate for them to be named
lib<name>-php, as is done with Perl and Java libraries (and perhaps
others)?

Charles
--
Brother speeders
Let's
Rehearse
All together
"Good morning, Nurse!"
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1942/brother_speeders
Uwe Steinmann
2006-05-30 15:49:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Charles Fry
Hi,
Currently PHP Pear modules are named php-<name>. Since these modules are
actually libraries would it not be more appropriate for them to be named
lib<name>-php, as is done with Perl and Java libraries (and perhaps
others)?
It's more like a matter of taste. The python stuff is called
python-<name>. On the other hand there are already libphp-<name>
packages. Would that be another option?
We may also consider that from a users point of view
a pecl extension isn't much different from a pear package. So,
should pecl extensions also be called lib<name>-php?
I always found the name php-<name> and php[4|5]-<name> very
consitent, but I also wouldn't mind to use another naming schema.

Uwe
--
MMK GmbH, Fleyer Str. 196, 58097 Hagen
***@mmk-hagen.de
Tel: +2331 840446 Fax: +2331 843920
Loading...